Back in the mid 1960s, the days of flower power and a few substances, other than alcohol, which could mess with your head  I was fortunate enough to be living and working in the middle of London. 

Naturally I was cautious about imbibing in substances other than water or eating anything more adventurous than a cucumber sandwich.

At that time, around 1965,  a young troubadour by the name of Donovan was making waves in the music world. His lyrics were a little difficult to understand but a modicum of research has revealed that he may have been the unwitting instigator of the great artwork in Fremantle which is now refusing to leave. 


One of his hits from around 1966 was ‘Mellow Yellow’. Nobody has actually been able to work out what it was all about, let alone Donovan himself.  

One verse runs:

Electrical banana

Is gonna be a sudden craze

Electrical banana

Is bound to be the very next phase

Nobody actually knew what an Electric Banana was.  Donovan was unable to offer a clear explanation and there may have been a good reason.

However one story is that an Electric Banana was made by getting a couple of sticks of Juicy Fruit chewing gum and inserting them under the skin of the ‘nana. The fruit was then left to mature over a few days and, in fact, go a little mouldy. Hence ‘Mellow Yellow’ Then, and there are several versions of this, you simply peel the banana and eat it, gum and all. The net results were some pretty wild hallucinations.

Some people say it didn’t work. I confess my memory is not serving me well.


It does appear that our mayor  dreamt that a  lot of banana shaped curves, draped artistically on the walls of the West End buildings, would serve the city well. 

Thus the dream of Brad and Felice the Artist came to fruition (fruit being the operative word). The High Street was decorated with banana peel look-alike graphics. It worked and the world woke up to the dream.

Sadly, or at least amusingly, the artwork is refusing to leave us and true to the legend, going a little mouldy. It’s now supplying endless entertainment. It is, as the mayor likes to expound – a sustainable dream come true. 


Those of us who have been around since well before the last rains know the original recipe for the Mellow Yellow bananas didn’t work too well. 

A modified version was derived using Dichloromethane injected into the bananas. It apparently worked wonders. But here’s the real rub – Dichloromethane is  nothing more than paint stripper! Had the Mayor used an up-dated recipe for the idea in the first place maybe the art would disappear immediately, just like any other hallucinogen. (I’m not sure up-dated is the right word)

Of course it doesn’t end there. Donovan did at one time confess he’d heard an electric banana is a yellow, battery powered, dildo. 

The mind boggles but there may be enough of them in the sex shop in High Street to supply council members with a few to strip paint, or whatever moves their fancy. I didn’t use ‘up-dated’ in this paragraph but was tempted.

Here are the lyrics to Mellow Yellow. Maybe they can sing along to them while they work and dream.

MELLOW YELLOW (Written by © Donovan Leith, circa 1965)

I’m just mad about Saffron

Saffron’s mad about me

I’m just mad about Saffron

She’s just mad about me

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

I’m just mad about Fourteen

Fourteen’s mad about me

I’m just mad about Fourteen

She’s just mad about me

They call me mellow yellow

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

Born high forever to fly

Wind velocity nil

Wanna high forever to fly

If you want your cup I will fill

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

Electrical banana

Is gonna be a sudden craze

Electrical banana

Is bound to be the very next phase

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

Saffron, yeah

I’m just mad about her

I’m just mad about Saffron

She’s just mad about me

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

(Quite rightly)

They call me mellow yellow

Roger Garwood

Editor: <



In February this year the administrators for Perth builders Cooper and Oxley implemented legal action to recover a debt of  $6.12m allegedly owed by Sirona Capital, the developers of Fremantle’s King’s Square.
   Last month (May 2018) Sirona Capital’s  Managing Director Mathew MacNeilly quietly announced the case was settled. Presumably the debt had been paid.
   It’s reasonable conjecture to ask whether Fremantle’s councillors may have fallen for a well orchestrated smoke and mirrors trick.
   Over a year ago Sirona Capital requested a twelve month extension to pay for one of several properties purchased from Fremantle ratepayers’ assets.
   The 12 month deferred payment of $6.65m was due on May 9th 2018. It is for Sirona Capital’s acquisition of the Spicer site, one of a number of assets sold to the developer by council but not yet paid for.
   On February 8th this year journalists Kim MacDonald and Grant Taylor reported in  Perth Now  that a Supreme Court writ had been issued against Sirona Capital.
   MacDonald and Taylor outlined the writ claimed Sirona Capital’s directors and other executives had acted “fraudulently”,  “negligently” and made “misrepresentations” related to the conversion of a $5m loan into equity.
Cooper and Oxley’s administrators were seeking $5 million plus 15% interest on that sum since late 2011, about $1.2 million, plus unspecified damages.
   If Sirona Capital did pay Cooper and Oxley Councillors must now ask why did they not pay the $6.65m debt to ratepayers first?
If they did not pay money to Cooper and Oxley, nor to Fremantle the question is: “Were, or are, Sirona Capital solvent?”
   If on May 9th, 2018, Sirona could not pay their debt to Fremantle City Council and/or to Cooper and Oxley, they may have been insolvent,  had a legal obligation to stop trading immediately, or seek settlement with creditors. It appears they did the latter when asking for extended time to pay Fremantle Council.
APRIL 2017

The new due date for payment of the Spicer Site was 9th May 2018.

7th FEBRUARY  2018
It was reported  the administrator of Cooper & Oxley , Cameron Shaw of accountants Hall Chadwick, issued writs against Sirona Capital for $6.12m.
11th APRIL  2018
   Council members unanimously approved a proposal by Mayor Pettitt and seconded by Cr Hume that Sirona Capital be granted an additional 6 months to pay for the Spicer site.
Council minutes record:
  “That Council authorise the Chief Executive Officer authority to approve extension of the settlement date for the former Spicer property for a period up to 30 September, 2018 and amend the Project Development Deed in accordance with this extension.”
This was probably the earliest possible date the application for an extension could have been put before full council since the writ was issued.
19th APRIL  2018
   Immediately after gaining the  extension Matthew McNeilly, Sirona Capital’s Managing Director, announced action by the Cooper and Oxley administrators has been  withdrawn. Had $6.12m claim has been paid?  McNeill described it as  ‘settled’.
   It is reasonable supposition that the $6.65m for the May 9th payment for the Spicer site may have been used to settle the debt claimed by Cooper and Oxley’s administrators.
17th MAY  2018

Only four weeks after the Cooper and Oxley case was settled McNeilly announced $190m funding for the KSP.  The company had secured the funding from First State Super (FSS) and Altis Property partners. FSS manage the superannuation funds of 800,000 public service employees. McNeill claimed  banks  had ‘lost out’ on the chance to fund the King’s Square project.

A $190m financial package is not achieved overnight.  Sirona Capital must have been aware they had finance arranged, or were sure of getting it, before they asked for additional time to pay for the Spicer site.

  Fremantle’s Councillors may have fallen for a well planned financial manoeuvre.
   Observers are aware that Sirona had difficulty gaining financial backing from investors for the King’s Square redevelopment.
  There are close to 130 empty or demolished retail premises in Fremantle.   That includes shops demolished to make way for the shelved Hilton Hotel development; the Woolworth’s centre next to St Patrick’s Basilica; shops empty in arcades including the Coles Woolstore centre; shops under redevelopment by Sirona Capital and about 85 visually empty premises in the CBD.
   Faced with that scenario it is not surprising  investors display  caution before funding the construction of retail premises which form a substantial part of the King’s Square Plan.
  Fremantle cannot survive on the smell of coffee beans, hop extracts and festivals. The city is now ranked among the least financially secure shires in Western Australia. In short, the city’s economy has collapsed.
   Councillors must demand Sirona Capital settle for their purchase of ratepayers’ assets. They owe $6.65m for the Spicer site alone. They could be earning considerable interest on  money which is lost to the city and could be in excess of $1,000,000.
   To cover Sirona’s Capital’s non payment for a number of assets the City’s financial managers have removed $12.65m from the reserve fund, thus losing interest on that deposit. Over  3-4 years that could amount to interest of  $3,000,000. The council have described to cost as insignificant.
   Fremantle’s ratepayers – the real financial lifeblood of the city – must ask for an independent inquiry into the Kings Square Plan which has been shrouded by secrecy and spin.


Sunset Venues received the keys to J shed’s number 1 studio today (Thursday 6th July) and will pay only $402 per week on the prime property, representing a lower rent than many families pay for a small home or apartment in Fremantle.
The rent, described by Fremantle Council as a ‘startup’ figure, is granted under a scheme designed to help companies establish new businesses in the city.
Sunset’s 21 year lease over no.1 J Shed was activated last Saturday morning, the rent will not increase until 1st July 2018. They will then pay $800 per week and will not pay the full rental figure, $1616 a week, until July 2019. The rent has been described as ‘too low’ and a ‘peppercorn rent’ by critics of the plan.
Had council insisted the site was activated, with full rent, in 2015 ratepayers would have been better off by about $255,000.
The council will only receive approximately $60,000 over two years.
Mayoral candidate Ra Stewart, has mentioned that council should not be responsible for Sunset’s poor management.

At a public information meeting in the Council Chamber two years ago David Chitty, a director and principle spokesperson for a number of related companies, was asked, ‘What will you do with regard to public behaviour after your concert events?’
He replied, “I have no responsibility for the behaviour of people when they leave the venue”. In fact he does but seems to be blissfully unaware of laws related to licensed premises.
There have been numerous complaints in relation to concerts held in Fremantle, including those held by Sunset at the J Shed venue. Fremantle residents spoke of people vomitting, defecating and urinating in the streets and doorways after the concerts. There were also complaints of vandalism and excessive noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests that immediately Sunset’s concerts finished security guards, who searched concert patrons before entry to venues, were stood down.
Chitty was also asked what he would do in relation to people listening to concerts from public spaces. He replied that he would ‘call on the police’ to remove people from those locations. That is an indication he may only be interested in guarding profit margins at the expense of legal considerations for public behaviour.

A licensed bar of 400 people is not likely to be trouble free. There is also an underlying opinion that there will be concerts. The application for the site’s activities says there will be no ‘paid’ music. This could mean that unpaid musicians may be used and the potential remains to apply for professional concerts later.
The Sunset companies are struggling to pay their suppliers and have failed to reactivate the Drill Hall where Fly by Nite operated. Could this lack of activation be because the Sunset companies have a reputation for not paying their suppliers and artists and musicians are not prepared to work for them? Sunset had applied for a delay of lease activation for 12 months. A principle reason was related to financial instability.

Council placed Sunset under pressure to perform following a unanimous vote to refuse an additional 12 months grace before the lease’s activation.
The Fremantle Inner City Residents Association (FICRA), in a submission to Council, outlined a number of issues related to Sunset’s inability to manage the site successfully. They say Sunset is already in fundamental breach of the lease by failing to “use its best endeavours” to secure necessary approvals by the required time. They also say, “Given that Sunset have known since the lease was signed in 2015 that they have had no financial success in the interim period it is unlikely they will gain large investment funding”.
It now rests with Fremantle Council to ensure the lease is implemented and, in the event of default, take rapid action, possibly to evict the company and revoke the lease.

FICRA outline, ‘There will almost certainly be a continuing failure by the lessee to meet fundamental obligations saying, ‘The unwillingness or incapacity of [Sunset] to pay the already reduced rent (25%) does not suggest willingness or capacity in the future to provide substantial investment as the lease contemplates’.

A few days remain to contact council and express your opinion in relation to the revised plans for J Shed.

This link will take you to the web site.


Roger Garwood : Editor

SUSTAINABILITY: The Buzzword which led Fremantle Nowhere.



Fremantle’s current council were voted in on promises delivered by a mantra – Sustainability. But what progress has been made on the back of the buzz? Very little.

NOT PARIS. A neglected building in the heart of Fremantle's West End. Rumour is that this may become a victim of demolition and increased height. A chance for councillors to consider their obligations to voters, not to developers. ©Roger Garwood 2016
A neglected building in the heart of Fremantle’s West End. Rumour is that this  building may become a victim of demolition and increased height. A chance for councillors to consider their obligations to voters, not to developers. 
©Roger Garwood 2016

Councillors  Mute in the Face of Developers

Now, with time running out on several plans, notably the King’s Square development, a new buzzword is worming around the West End – Demolition – and not a single councillor has actively promoted the notion of conservation and restoration and been courageous enough to condemn the plan to demolish 75 High Street. Forgive me if they have but it would be very useful for the public to become  aware of any such notions by their elected members.

Gobbledgook from the Green’s Corner

We have been blessed with Councillor Sullivan’s obfuscation in relation to the recent application for demolition of 75 High Street. Sullivan is a master of discombobulation, leaving readers and listeners wondering what he actually stands for. Interestingly he lists among his architectural achievements his involvement with the Leighton Beach and the Northshore developments. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and it is up to individuals to judge those developments. Apart from Sullivan there appear to be no councillors with architectural experience.

Spongy Economics of King’s Square 

If we are to apply demolition tactics to old and singularly unattractive buildings we should look closely at the spongy economics of the King’s Square plan. An obvious option would be to give Fremantle a truly attractive town centre by demolishing the Myer building and the carpark at the rear as well as Queensgate. This area could then become an attractive central park which showcases the Town Hall and St. Patrick’s Church. It would have on one boundary a row of beautifully renovated cottages.   New council administration offices could be built on the Spicer’s site, overlooking the city square and accommodating a library above ground. (The current plan calls for an underground library). That is obviously not going to happen but it may be the best and most economical option for the city in the long run.

One of a number of Parisian shop fronts photographed by Lidia D'Opera. They display a stylish, appealing, shabby chic. A concept which could easily be emulated in Fremantle's West End. © Lidia D'Opera 2016
One of a number of Parisian shop fronts photographed by Lidia D’Opera. They display a stylish, appealing, shabby chic. A concept which could easily be emulated in Fremantle’s West End.
© Lidia D’Opera 2016

Is Conservation Uneconomical? That suppositon is easily disproved

Fremantle’s historic architecture is sustainable. Should the buzzword now be ‘conservation’ which, by its nature, encompasses ‘sustainable’? Critics have said restoration is uneconomical and that people don’t like working in old buildings.

The University of Notre Dame has restored a large part of the West End enclave. Their architect, the late Marcus Collins, successfully designed and directed the renovation of properties while maintaining the architectural integrity and character of the West End and he was able to work within what he described as a limited budget.

It's not difficult to find style, nor follow ethnic backgrounds. In that respect Fremantle has many options. The city has a number of strong ethnic communities who could help promote a colourful cross cultural background. © Lidia D'Opera 2016
It’s not difficult to find style, nor follow ethnic backgrounds in Paris or other major cities in Europe.  In that respect Fremantle has many options. The city has a number of strong ethnic communities who could help promote a colourful cross cultural background.
© Lidia D’Opera 2016

The success of the university in attracting students and staff to work and study in the enclave is patently obvious. Logic demonstrates that stylish, high quality, renovation of properties can be accomplished and make economical sense. Notre Dame have also demonstrated that it is not necessary to increase height. Interestingly so have Match with their east end redevelopment of the old wool stores. In spite of council approving a height increase on the building Match went back to their figures and decided it was more profitable not to increase the building’s height.

World Class Restoration Succeeds: Fremantle needs Civic Pride

The use of colour on shopfronts, and maybe the reconstruction of original shop fronts in the West End, is not beyond the realms of possibility. Conciencious developers and property managers should consider a range of options. © Lidia D'Opera 2016

More use of colour on shopfronts, possibly heritage colour options, and maybe the reconstruction of original shop fronts in the West End is not beyond the realms of possibility. Conciencious developers and property managers should consider a range of options. 
© Lidia D’Opera 2016

Recent world class restorations in Fremantle include The National Hotel, The Federal Hotel with the Warders’ Cottages nearing completion. Shortly the renovated Norwegian Consular Office on the corner of Cliff and Phillimore Streets will be unveiled. These are examples council should be noting and learning from. They should not bow  to pressure from property owners wishing to demolish and rebuild with added height using the developers mantra- ‘It’s the only way to make it economical’

Fremantle needs imagination, cultural nous and civic pride to be demonstrated and promoted by councillors, developers and architects.

Cities such as Paris take an enormous pride in conserving their precincts. So does Napier in NZ where a small group of people, within a relatively short period of time, turned their city’s fortunes around by promoting its architecture. <;

Note: Many thanks to my colleague Lidia D’Opera for the use of her pictures. Her web site is at <; and is well worth exploring.

A perfect example of conservation in the West End which contains the diverse social and cultural requirements of a city. © Roger Garwood 2016
Perfect examples of conservation in Fremantle’s West End,  containing the diverse social and cultural requirements of a city.
© Roger Garwood 2016

Lutton Slams Planning System ‘Council Must Listen to Residents’

Fremantle Not Broken

Dr Linley Lutton, who recently retired from Fremantle Design Advisory Committee (DAC), made a public presentation on Tuesday evening (18th February) as to the faults in the city’s current planning system.  He  outlined the importance of street level activity encouraged by using a blend of cafes and a variety of shops and advocates a mix of office and residential accommodation above street level. He stressed that Fremantle is not a broken city.  The overwhelming impression he gave is that Fremantle can be readily developed with medium to high-rise buildings providing more consideration is given to the style and use of buildings.

The public meeting, organised by Fremantle Inner City Residents Association (FICRA) attracted a near capacity audience of about 200 at Notre Dame University.

Dr Lutton detailed faults with the plans for Queensgate and the massive Point Street proposal. Underlining what he considered essential setbacks of higher stories in order they are not visible from street level, he used a simple projected presentation for the purpose backed up with drawn on buildings to underline systems which he explained are being used around the world.

Lutton was emphatic that the planning approval system operated by Fremantle council should be changed. In particular he feels the city’s planning committee should be abandoned and proposals should be placed before all council members.

He also stressed that regular changes to the committee chair should be made, dispensing with what he described as ‘political appointments’.

‘ … you’ll only get developers views’

The most radical recommendation is that an incorporated body should be formed to mount legal challenges to council decisions related to poor quality development.

Dr Lutton underlined that councils should listen closely to residents. He said: “If you only listen to developers you’ll only get developers views”.

He also stressed that council’s wish list for property development indicated the amount of office space planned was impractical. Latest figures show Perth is oversubscribed with office space. The figures have been challenged by Councillor Andrew Sullivan in information given to Backchat following the public meeting.

Two councillors attended the meeting. South Ward councillor Andrew Sullivan who was the former chair of the city’s planning committee and Bill Massie from Hilton Ward. City Ward councillors Rachel Pemberton and newly elected Simon Naber did not attend. Mayor Dr Brad Pettitt sent apologies (He had an official engagement with the Portuguese Ambassador) but has asked for a viewing of a video made of the presentation. Fremantle’s Director Of planning, Phil St John, attended.

Massie:  ‘I disagree’

Councillor Massie, while agreeing with the overall thrust of the evening’s presentation was at odds with Dr Lutton on a few points: “I disagree with Linley that Fremantle is not a  broken city. What council are trying to do now is repair damage caused by our predecessors”.

He went on to say:

“I also disagree that mall’s do not work … you only have to go to Perth’s Hay Street Mall to see they can …I also believe that Fremantle does require major retailers in the heart of the city attracting customers that may look elsewhere, Dr Lutton stating major retailers can go to Cockburn, Garden City or Claremont is driving business out of the heart. There is a need for Fremantle to move forward which includes development residential, retail & office space which may not be in demand at this point but the market changes & we need to be in a position to meet the demand as required”

Sullivan: ‘Fremantle clearly in the doldrums … faces insignificance’

Councillor Andrew Sullivan did not discuss any of the points made by Dr Lutton publicly though he has given a detailed response to Backchat. 

He agrees to an extent that Fremantle is not broken but says: “It is clearly in the doldrums”. He believes the city can be a much better place than it is and fears it is slipping into  ‘cultural and commercial insignificance’.

Illustrating a need for balance Sullivan says he does not want to see the city evolve into either a vertical dormitory or ‘quaint retirement village for baby boomers’.

East End Deserves a Rebirth

He says: “Our place may not be broken but cities must evolve. The east end is a pretty soulless place that deserves a rebirth.

“Councils strategy is to increase commercial office space by 70,ooosqm, not the 275,000sqm that Linley suggested”

Sullivan continued: “The development focus is to bring a few thousand inner city residents into an area that has very low residential density which Linley highlighted as being desirable”.

He explained residential targets should be relatively easy to meet but commercial targets will be difficult in the current economic climate. He stressed that council are encouraging restoration of heritage buildings to provide high quality office accommodation.

Council’s Ambitious Targets

Sullivan explained that councils targets are ‘unashamedly ambitious’ but it is essential for Fremantle to outbid other centres as a desirable location for companies to establish themselves.

“Fremantle is a great place to work because of its setting and lifestyle advantage – why would anyone set up in Cockburn Central when Fremantle is beckoning?”

Sullivan, the former head of the Planning Committee, said: “I was pleased that Linley emphasised that residents should not be afraid of building heights proposed in Amendment 49. I agree it is important to focus on how the buildings are presented. Design quality can and should be measured objectively. That is why we established the Design Advisory Committee”.

Andrew Sullivan states Dr Lutton’s accusations that the DAC is being corrupted is ‘wholly unsubstantiated and offensive’.

“I fought hard to have the DAC created . I wanted them to help us deliver better buildings in Fremantle … but Linley is right to suggest that some developers come kicking and screaming to the DAC table … we all want standards to  get considerably better”.

Dr Lutton gave an extensive overview of the proposed developments of King’s Square and Newman Court as well as Queensgate.

Councillor Sullivan said: “He actually had the wrong drawings so the basis of his assessment was flawed. The 3D images he used of Newman Court was actually the proposed internal arcade for Queensgate. Neither I nor the Director of Planning had ever seen the plans he referred to. That said  I agree the aim is to get people using streets rather than developing internal arcades.

“Linley’s assessment of the new Queensgate building in relation to additional height was also flawed”. Councillor Sullivan explained that Amendment 49 provisions allow for extra height at street frontage but only if design excellence is achieved. The planning committee deferred that proposal because it wasn’t satisfied the DAC had given approval … that’s evidence the system is working”.

No Right of Appeal

On the issue of Dr Linley’s proposal to establish an organisation to handle appeals Andrew Sullivan said: ” Sadly there is no right of appeal to the SAT on planning matters. I have campaigned for years to to get our state government to introduce third party rights of appeal for some planning matters … only a developer or proponent can initiate an appeal”.

There were calls from the audience that Dr Lutton should be re-appointed to the DAC. Three resolutions were passed:

More Experts Called For

• That FICRA make representations to have Dr Linley Lutton reinstated to the DAC committee.

• That FICRA seek to have Fremantle Council improve the DAC committee with:

a) A rotating chair every three months

b) An increased pool of experts to draw from

c) More detailed recording of and reporting on committee minutes

•  That FICRA establish a community expert reference  group to make submissions on major developments.

FICRA have tapped into a growing groundswell of public opinion from a sector of Fremantle’s residents who are asking for their opinions to be considered seriously by council. The current feeling is that their opinions are being ignored at best or simply dismissed with no consideration. If this organisation can expand to encompass a a broader membership, possibly by broad cooperation with the Fremantle Residents and Ratepayers Association, it will represent a very active movement and possibly ensure a balanced approach to management within council